1,291
16
Essay, 5 pages (1200 words)

Criminal justice

Advertising We'll write a high-quality original custom paper on Criminal justice just for you with a 15% discount for the 1st order Use a Discount Use a Discount

YesThe Death Penalty, if properly administered, definitely would be a deterrent to crime.

But we have two basic camps in this country. One wants to punish the offender with complete banishment from society. These anti-death penalty mobs consider the weapon as the murderer, not the person. They march in front of prisons whenever we lose one of those perverts or murderers, who have taken the life of an innocent victim.

They would rather kill the guns, inert tools on their own, but dangerous in the hands of the corrupt. The Second Amendment is more dangerous to these liberal thinkers than an evil man. Evil. You remember, God, eternally glorious v. Satan, the evil one. But even without these so called religious or spiritual convictions, natural law tells you that one who lies in wait to kill another man deserves to die.

But we are now so enlightened, that these crooks get automatic appeals all the way up to the Supreme Court. This results in a Life sentence in front of the gallows, which has successfully been argued as cruel. To fix this broken mentality, two easy steps are required. Elect common sense citizens to office and then expect them to use their common sense. This would go a long way toward simply asking the pertinent questions. Was a crime committed Did someone die These two must be answered affirmatively to even consider the death penalty.

Once guilt is established, special treatment is not given for appellants. If that penalty is given, appeal with your reasons, like everyone else. Since no one can guarantee that the most educated will commit the crime, someone who may have streaks of ignorance laced throughout his personality may be given the death penalty. Still, there remains the problem of the color of justice being green, as in dollars and cents. To take this out of the equation, all payments by any defendant must be held in escrow until his trial, investigation, arraignment and indictment or no bill is returned, or, in cases of a mistrial, (on occasion manipulated into reality by defense tactics that are not above board); until a complete investigation of any of these reasons for it is completed.

Any perjury, intimidation, etc, found to be in malfeasance against the purpose of the court, would cause complete forfeiture of these payments and a minimum schedule of required payments, must be kept by the defendant relative to the charges against him (or her). Once agreed to by the court that all is above board, their attorneys may be paid from the escrow. And they may receive back whatever sum is left after all legitimate payments are made. But then, what about those who are publicly defended Well, some of these fines could go toward getting better public defenders, for one thing. Still, while all of this financial discussion has the tendency to wander away from the subject at hand, the subject is truly about justice.

Justice must be done, for all, as the pledge says. Justice is not just injecting a murderer with chemicals designed to stop his living upon this earth. It is also for the victims, who may have spent years wondering, Who could have done this When they finally find out, they are the ones who are made to feel most guilty about the loss society will face when the murderer of their kin and friend is put away forever. When the perpetrator leaves this world, rest assured that he (or she) will never murder another.

Most people would not want to face such a fate. Surely, as we know, most people already dont murder anyway. The deterrent then, must be ascribed as having its effect upon that criminal element who perpetrate these crimes. Many criminals also already do not wish to kill anyone. They just want to take the money and disappear.

Yet still, people are murdered and that old argument that most are killed by family or fiance, raises its head. If these are the only people left on earth to deter, we may indeed fail in deterring them. Yet, we know that people who kill within their own family are especially emotionally disturbed for whatever reason, leaving little room for victims to escape.

As far as the secondary death penalty goes, (the one which states that self-defense is your right in public or private), the Second Amendment being the cornerstone of such a right, one realizes that far more than 400-500 executions take place each year. On the other hand, cops arrest many more, safely, without any shots heard, on a daily basis. Most of these are for petty crimes, but some are for grand theft or all the way up to murder.

Yet, no officer in America could ever be recognized for a justifiable defense of another without those few whispering, I wonder why he set this up that way being heard. The corruption of language also plays a part. The government does not murder by doing their duty, by following due process of law. Due process does not mean automatic appeals for some, or else a special right is given. Due process does not mean a kangaroo court, either. Between the extremes, government must remain neutral to the parties, then fulfill the results by allowing the innocent to go free and punishing the offenders (not the weapons, but the convicts).

Finding the balance will never be possible while the liberal leaders lead courts down a pathway of alleged Utopian bliss, allowing for their brothers, murderous gangsters, who enjoy their help in escaping justice, to continue on with rapaciousness. NoYou only have to look as far as national crime statistics to see that the death penalty is no deterrent. The more important issue is that the death penalty is a barbaric exercise in which no civilized society should participate. Accordin g a report by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (which is readily available on the FBIs Web site), there were almost 17, 000 murders and cases of “ non-negligent manslaughter” in the United States in 2005. Does that sound like a deterrentThere are many studies that offer convincing evidence that anger – a major factor in most violent crimes – is most often caused by a sense of having been disrespected; you embarrass or humiliate someone, they lash out, thing get out of control, and someone ends up dead. The U. S. – which is constantly telling other nations how they should behave – should practice the one behavior that is the linch-pin of a civilized society: respect.

If we would treat offenders, even the worst ones, with respect, they might just feel different about society. That means police officers need to control their tempers and stop beating suspects. It means politicians needs to debate their opponents with respect rather than trying to win the nights sound byte. And pop stars like Lindsay Lohan and Avril Lavigne could even help by not taking such horrible pot shots at one another.

Finally, it wouldnt hurt if the media stopped glorifying violence with television programs like “ The Shield” and “ 24” (two programs, incidentally, that I enjoyed until I began to realize the impact they were having on my own personality). The death penalty only teaches society that we have a right to revenge. And that is not justice

Thanks for your opinion!
Criminal justice. Page 1
Criminal justice. Page 2
Criminal justice. Page 3
Criminal justice. Page 4
Criminal justice. Page 5
Criminal justice. Page 6

Your fellow student wrote and submitted this work, "Criminal justice". This sample can be used for research and reference in order to help you write your own paper. It is prohibited to utilize any part of the work without a valid citation.

If you own this paper and don't want it to be published on EduFrogs.com, you can ask for it to be taken down.

Ask for Removal

Cite this Essay

References

EduFrogs. (2022) 'Criminal justice'. 21 November.

Reference

EduFrogs. (2022, November 21). Criminal justice. Retrieved from https://edufrogs.com/criminal-justice-3/

References

EduFrogs. 2022. "Criminal justice." November 21, 2022. https://edufrogs.com/criminal-justice-3/.

1. EduFrogs. "Criminal justice." November 21, 2022. https://edufrogs.com/criminal-justice-3/.


Bibliography


EduFrogs. "Criminal justice." November 21, 2022. https://edufrogs.com/criminal-justice-3/.

Work Cited

"Criminal justice." EduFrogs, 21 Nov. 2022, edufrogs.com/criminal-justice-3/.

Get in Touch with Us

If you have ideas on how to improve Criminal justice, feel free to contact our team. Use the following email to reach to us: [email protected]